🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has declared it is pursuing compensation valued at $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This legal step represents a direct response from the Kremlin regarding plans to utilize immobilized Russian sovereign funds to aid Ukraine.

The Substantial Demand

According to reports in Russian state media, the central bank initiated a claim last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This amount corresponds to the stated $230 billion demand.

EU leaders are set to decide later this week regarding a plan to use around €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. The proposal entails providing Ukraine with a substantial loan to finance its defence and financial needs.

The vast majority of these funds, amounting to €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution serves as the main keeper for the Russian immobilised financial reserves.

A Clash Over Legality

EU authorities have maintained that their proposal is on solid legal ground. They argue is based on the fact that ownership of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, even though it was immobilized in European jurisdictions shortly after the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, in contrast, has called any use of the assets as theft. Authorities have warned of retaliatory actions, such as confiscating EU corporate holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has taken on a prominent position in peace negotiations, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its funds. He warned that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the plan.

Wider Implications

With statements interpreted as an attempt to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, the official described the proposal as "a severe assault on property rights and the global financial system established by the United States."

The clearing house declined to provide a statement on the new legal action. It has in the past stated it is contending with over 100 legal cases in Russian courts.

Enforcement Challenges

While judges in EU countries are not expected to enforce rulings from Russian tribunals, experts expect Moscow to pursue implementation in nations with closer relations to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities may attempt to enforce a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic states, if relevant assets can be located," commented a lawyer from an international firm.

European Safeguards

European authorities said they are working on measures to deter other nations from aiding any Russian lawsuits against European entities. Additionally, they are crafting safeguards to shield EU countries with investments in Russia from what they term "unlawful expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

According to the detailed scheme, the EU would provide an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the cash earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's legal claim on the principal funds would remain unaffected.

Kyiv would only be obligated to return the money in the event that Russia agreed to pay compensation for the vast destruction caused during the nearly four-year war.

Alternative Proposals

Belgium, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an alternative approach for financing Ukraine. This involves common EU debt issuance to fund a loan, backed by unused funds within the EU budget.

Such a proposal, however, demands unanimity among all 27 EU countries. The Hungarian government, considered aligned with the Kremlin, has already signaled its objection.

Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, described the proposed loan scheme as "the strongest option" for supporting Ukraine. "The reparations loan is secured against the Russian frozen assets, meaning it doesn't come from our taxpayers' money, which is also important," she stated. "Furthermore, it delivers a clear signal that if you cause all this destruction to another country, you must pay for the reparations."