🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. HDHP. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands this complex system? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Neither the average employee. Selecting the right healthcare insurance for companies – or for households – seems like demands advanced expertise in medical insurance.

Our Medical System Is More Than Complicated, It's Expensive

According to recent research, typical households pays $27,000 each year on medical coverage (up 6% from last year). Typical company healthcare expense is projected to exceed $17,000 for each worker in 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Currently federal operations has ceased functioning because political disagreements regarding subsidies which analysts predict could cause a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

When will we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I have to believe we're approaching that point because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm proposing that our already existing Medicare system – an insurance system – simply expand to cover everyone. The existing system doesn't change. The way medical professionals receive payment changes. Believe me, they'll adapt.

How National Health Insurance Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would need payments from both workers and companies. In similar programs, an employee earning moderate income pays about 5.3% toward medical coverage. Their employer must contribute about 13.75%.

Does this seem expensive? Unless you compare that with what average American pays. I can name multiple businesses that are easily contributing between eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that with inclusive programs, these contributions include retirement benefits, sick pay, maternity leave and job loss protection in addition to supporting medical services. When including those costs compared with our current spending on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Implementation in the US

In the US, a national health premium would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a framework already established. It ought to be means-based – those at higher income levels would pay more than those earning less. This includes both worker and employer contribution. Similar to many federal defense, technology, social programs and transportation services, the system should be outsourced to third-party administrators rather than a government office.

Advantages for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program represents a huge benefit for entrepreneurs like mine. It would put us on a level playing field with our larger competitors that can pay for better plans. It would make management significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding remitted like retirement and healthcare taxes, instead of separate payments to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would enable it easier to plan expenses annual expenditures, rather than going through the complex (and ineffective) theater of negotiating with major insurers required annually every year. Due to simplification, there would be a better understanding about benefits among workers – as opposed to existing arrangements where they have to interpret the complications of existing plans. And there would definitely exist less liability for employers since we wouldn't would be privy to our employees' medical records for weighing risks and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as they get. But I've learned that government has a significant role in our lives, from providing defense to funding needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone through a national insurance system strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, easier system for small businesses which hire more than half of the country's workers and fund half of our GDP. It makes it possible employees to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Are there a million considerations I'm not addressing? Of course there are. Given rising medical expenses we've seen recently, it's clear that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning effectively. I understand that we're not a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. However extending Medicare for all, even with increased taxation that would be incurred, would still be a superior and more affordable approach both for controlling healthcare costs but providing access for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, must reduce our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't so great. The US places well below numerous nations in healthcare quality in the world, according to major studies. Perhaps a positive aspect amid current situation is that we take a hard look at ourselves and agree that major reforms need to happen.